Tutorial 1 Quiz #1
Multiple-choice exercise
Choose the correct answer for each question.
A simple argument, as we define it, is...
- a piece of evidence for a claim.
- a reason for a contention
- an argument that is not very complicated.
- a reason with its contention, or an objection with its contention
- an argument with only one claim per box.
A contention, in our sense, is...
- a sentence which completes the argument.
- a proposition which has been proven.
- a final summing-up of the reasoning.
- a claim for which there is at least one reason or objection.
Why are simple arguments important?
- They are the basic units of all reasoning and argumentation.
- They are very common.
- They are easily understood.
- They are usually very strong.
- They are friends with all the right people.
Boxes in argument maps should always contain full sentences because...
- using full sentences shows that you have command of language.
- reasoning is a matter of relationships among propositions, and anything less than a full sentence does not express a proposition.
- if you don't use a full sentence you might miss something out.
- you might not be able to remember properly if you just use a word or phrase.
- using words or phrases in place of full sentences is sloppy thinking.
Which of these claims is NOT true?
- Simple arguments have two main parts.
- A reason becomes an objection, and vice versa, if you reverse the contention.
- In argument mapping, sentences inside boxes must be declarative.
- Some complex arguments are wholly built out of simple arguments, in our technical sense, but some are not.
What is the main problem with this argument map?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/38019/38019ba9f33f557b5bb234161b189069676b4dae" alt=""
- The evidence goes against the contention, so it should be an objection (red).
- One of the boxes does not contain a declarative sentence.
- The reason is not really evidence for the contention; it is a related idea, but incorrectly mapped.
- The reason and the contention are not really different.
What is the main problem with this argument map?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cdef1/cdef14cbc08e00c4097e630dbe89a957f4c7ca01" alt=""
- The objection contains reasoning inside it, which should be unpacked.
- One of the boxes does not contain a grammatical sentence.
- The "evidence" does not really go against the contention.
- There are too many words in the objection.